Change: Ready or not, here it comes!

by Bill Bishop

Looking for future trendsThe magnitude and rate of change we're involved in today is unprecedented. Mobile devices are permanently changing the fabric of our lives. And speed is changing the way we make decisions. Tom Van Aman has thought longer and harder than almost anyone we know about change, and these are among the topics he brought up when we invited him to a free-wheeling discussion about what's happening today and how it will affect the future.

Tom currently serves as Marketing Manager for the Insight, Design and Innovation Center at Allstate Insurance. He also brings to the topic long years of experience in the consumer package goods business – as a brand marketer, information provider, and market researcher. The views expressed in this interview represent his personal perspective, and are in no way intended to represent Allstate.

Editor’s note: Throughout, regular type indicates Tom is speaking. Bill’s comments appear in italic.

The rate of change is accelerating.

The magnitude of the changes we are undergoing are as big as the shift from the agricultural age to the industrial age. Ten years ago, there was no social media, there were no smartphones, no tablets, and Google was a private company. We now live in an information age, but it hasn’t fully engaged yet and the changes will keep coming, probably at an increasing rate.

Mobile has changed our lives for good.

Mobile phones and tablets have completely changed the fabric of our lives. Clearly, mobile phones are no longer devices whose purpose is making phone calls or even texting. People use them for entertainment, engagement, internet access, information gathering, shopping, payment, even banking in some parts of the world.

I don’t think this change is generational, even though we like to talk about which age group is doing what. Once people of any age adopt new technology, they don’t revert back to old devices. If someone sees something on TV that they want more information about, they don’t leave their mobile device on the couch and go upstairs to sit at a PC.

If you’re building your customer interface around a PC, you are going to be out of the picture in three years, because most of the interface will be via mobile devices.

Innovation is happening in new places.

For the first time in my memory, innovation is happening in the developing world, not here and not in Europe. Innovation is happening in India, the Middle East, China, Africa, the Pacific Rim – because that’s where the money is. Six billion people have cell phones in developing countries.

Bill: Interesting. You’re suggesting we need to start looking for signs of the future in different places than we used to look.

Speed is a given.

We talked about the accelerating pace of change earlier, but there’s another aspect of speed that’s also shaping the future. I speak at a conference on innovation that’s attended by marketers and market researchers, and this year a number of the participants approached me to talk about how algorithms are driving change and becoming the means for a great deal of decision-making and execution.

In the financial services sector, many trading decisions are made by algorithms today, and the speed with which these algorithmic decisions are made is breathtaking. Information about trades is received and acted on in microseconds – one millionth of a second. Companies are building towers next to the source of the signals that broadcast trading information so they can capture it a fraction of a microsecond sooner. There’s no way human beings can match this pace. That blink Malcolm Gladwell writes about? It’s glacially slow by comparison – a blink takes 350,000 microseconds.

Bill: If algorithms are changing the WAY decisions are made, we’re in for a lot more change. We wrote about an app for auto technicians recently that used algorithms to compare a photo of a worn belt with a new one to determine if a replacement was needed. Here, the judgment of an experienced technician is replaced by an algorithm.

The cheap labor of the future is robots. Computer-driven algorithms that allow robots to make intelligent decisions have already made it possible for robots to help build cars and even assist surgeons in the operating room. There will be many more robots in our future, and this is going to have huge implications for society – it will affect how and where work is done, products are made, and services are delivered.

Retail touchpoints

One of the places where speed and change show up in retail is the supply chain. Remember how radical it was when Walmart told suppliers it expected 24-hour replenishment for out of stock items?

Bill: And now we’re looking at same-day delivery for online orders to customers. I came across the idea of “de-averaging” the other day. Most stores are built to serve the “average customer.” What if we use the technology – the data and algorithms needed to analyze it quickly – to take the “average” out of retail and serve the patrons of a particular store more specifically and more efficiently. That’s a big idea.

The biggest challenge? “Keeping up” or “Changing fast enough.”

What will the information age look like in 2022? We can’t know, but some things seem evident:

  • There will be more mobile, and less PC – maybe Google glasses or other wearable devices.
  • The pace of change will continue to increase.
  • There will be more algorithmic decision making.

What concerns me is that we don’t have efficient ways of handling change. The speed with which algorithms can make decisions and create change is very different from the pace at which human beings can make decisions and respond to change. Dealing with the mismatch is going to be a huge challenge for management. We don't have a decision-making process for this situation.

Bill: The image of where we want to take this doesn’t exist yet, does it? And this hampers us. We need to develop this vision, because without it we’ll continue to go in circles.

Comments RSS

BlackBeltBob Sherlock said:
Tom and Bill, these are terrific discussion points!
Automated robotic warehouse picking of orders that grocery customers order using voice recognition software in their smartphones, coupled with drive-through pickup locations, could make it compellingly attractive for more consumers to let "robots" do their grocery shopping. The traditional grocery store could lose enough revenue to imperil the old business model.
Susan Lindsay said:
I thought about robot pickers, too, Bob -- the kind that Amazon uses to bring merchandise from the warehouse to human packers.

Did anyone see the Sunday NY Times article on part-time workers? Algorithmic decision-making is clearly doing lots of employee scheduling these days. Seems it's enabling retailers to save money by being a lot more efficient in terms of scheduling staff. But it also sounds brutal for workers, who never know what their schedule will be from week to week and sometimes day to day. Hard to go to school or have a second job under those conditions.

When Bill and I talked with Tom, we also talked about the "glass half empty" side of assigning decision-making responsibility to mathematics. Math doesn't know when it's overstepped the bounds. I have to wonder if there will be a price to pay in terms of employee loyalty -- and maybe even brand loyalty down the road -- that comes from treating workers this way.

Here's a link to the Times article http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/business/a-part-time-life-as-hours-shrink-and-shift-for-american-workers.html?adxnnl=1&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1351772517-GR9fRgKrM/41q/En4HO1zA.
Tom Van Aman said:
Susan, I agree with your point that decision making with algorithms is dehumanizing.

The drive toward efficiency is misdirected as it too often ignores the emotional impact of decisions on the human spirit So it’s not just speed which causes a disconnect between algorithmic decision making it is also the absence of the human gestalt: a person's thoughts and experiences considered as a whole and regarded as amounting to more than the sum of its parts.

This is the essence of why an algorithm cannot replace human decision making especially on decisions affecting the human condition. Humans are spiritual beings, machines are not.
Bill Bishop said:
Tom makes the point that the shift to mobile is not generational and a new survey reported in the October 29th Supermarket News supports his point.

This survey found that there was virtually no difference between the way millennials and older shoppers use smartphones as a shopping tool. If you can’t use age to predict the shift to mobile shopping, what can you use?
BlackBeltMichael Sansolo said:
Another terrific and provocative article. And given the excellent caliber of discussion on this site I'd like to throw out a question based on recent events.

Because of the proximity of media to the areas devastated by Superstorm Sandy, we are seeing the daily struggle of recovery in the nation's largest market in graphic detail. The question: will this storm alter the discussions of ecommerce in any way? When disaster strikes people need the basics and frequently return to neighborhood stores. The logistics problems caused by Sandy made discussions of same-day delivery irrelevant. Could an incident like this cause people to rethink the benefits of local shops?

Personally I think the discussion changes for about two weeks. Once things are back up and running, a lot will be forgotten. But this is an opportunity for brick and mortar retailers to make a statement.

Any thoughts?
Bill Bishop said:
Michael – Thanks for raising this question. Since I’m not sure I have a good answer, here’s an idea that you triggered.

Can traditional retailers use their digital connections with customers to help them better prepare for the next storm? An oncoming storm creates real problems and, in this situation, a retailer has the chance to offer some high value solutions; i.e. something they do very well. Wonder if any retailer did something like this in anticipation of hurricane Sandy.
BlackBeltPaul Sabattus said:
To Michael's point on sandy: Several years ago I was running marketing at merchandising at a chain with low (15%) market share that had a direct hurricane impact. For three years prior to that storm, we had basically rebuilt our entire footprint from 25k foot stores to 80k+. In that process we greatly expanded our product offering and dramatically expanded our fuel station footprint. Despite all of the grand openings and ridiculous lead item pricing, we made some share impact but not as nearly as much as our plan had called for. We simply could not get meaningful trial from the customers of the share leader. Then we had a major hurricane.

The leadership team made a commitment to be open first, be stocked with staples and to be open first in our fuel stations and keep fuel in stock. To do this, we brought teams in from around the state and make special arrangements with the state for supply chain / traffic routing. The net result of this was being open a full day and a half before the share leader was. The overwhelming response was “Wow, I had no idea your stores looked like this today” and “Thank you for all you did to make this happen for my family.” The net result was we finally got trial of our new stores in this dire circumstance. Same store sales growth never let up after that and it still grows today. The same impact occurred two years later and with the same results. It was…the proverbial tipping point.

I think the big advantage for brick and mortar (local) is the power that lies within the fact that people matter. This applies to both the people who serve and those that are served. The storm is a very real way for traditional retailer to reconnect to their customers in an emotional way and rebuild their business and relationships. It is hard, if not impossible, for on-line retailers to build realtionships that matter.

Add a Comment